[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Responses to the list (oops)

On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 14:20 -0400, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> This is fine.  Notice how "reply to the list, but don't CC me" isn't 
> part of what "reasonable mailers" are expected to do:
> "Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a reasonable mailer. 
> People want to munge Reply-To headers to make "reply back to the list" 
> easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two separate 
> "reply" commands: one that replies directly to the author of a message, 
> and another that replies to the author plus all of the list recipients."


Ron Johnson, Jr.
Temporarily not of Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"The idea that a congressman would be tainted by accepting money
from private industry or private sources is essentially a
socialist argument."
Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: