Re: changing window managers
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:19:32PM -0700, Larry Fletcher wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 20050905201439.GA26723@alcopop.org> you wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:10:11AM -0700, Larry Fletcher wrote:
> > > After looking around some more I found out the x-session-manager works
> > > for startx, but it's not updated when new window managers are
> > > installed. The x-session-manager updates:
> > > /etc/alternatives/@x-session-manager
>
> > Why should the session manager symlink be changed by a window manager?
>
> > > The x-window-manager is updated when new window managers are
> > > installed, so maybe @x-session-manager should link to
> > > @x-window-manager?
>
> > No - x-session-manager should point to a session manager, and
> > x-window-manager to a window manager, respectively.
>
> > If you have a ~/.xsession file, you may have specified a window manager
> > in it.
>
> I didn't have a ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc file.
>
> > Otherwise, odds are the symlink from /usr/bin/x-window-manager is
> > being used.
>
> Okay. Now I see there is a difference between a session
> manager and a window manager. Apparently some window managers
> have session managers and need them to run properly and some
> window managers don't use them. The problem was I installed
> a window manager that didn't install a session manager and
> since the old session manager was still installed the new
> window manager wouldn't run.
>
> I also found it interesting that ~/.xinitrc takes precedence
> over ~/.xsession, and x-session-manager takes precedence over
> x-window-manager. So it doesn't work to use both ~/.xsession
> and ~/.xinitrc. The best option seems to be to put the session
> manager in ~/.xsession and not use ~/.xinitrc. And if there is
> no session manager, to put the window manager in ~/.xsession.
> Either that or learn how to configure x-session-manager and
> x-window-manager.
>
> Larry
>
Sorry if the question is stupid, but: What is a session manager, and how does it
get involved?
THX
--
Joachim Fahnenmüller
Reply to: