Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2005 12:40 am, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>First off, it would be nice if more people held that view. Maybe then
>>we would not be suffering at the hands of liberals and neo-cons that
>>think that the only way to accomplish anything is with a bigger
>>government that dictates people's personal lives to them.
> It's not liberals that feel that way. Liberal has just become a catch-all
> word used by people that want to blame someone else for doing what they think
> is wrong.
I used to think that way but once you look at it, nope, they're one of the
bigger causes of the problem. The difference is the liberals wrap their stink
in an outer coating of "but we're helping people." Let's not forget the
latest fiasco... OMG, a hack of GTA, a game where one jacks cars, starts and
actively participatesin gang wars, goes on assasin hits and other nice
things.... allows you to see a bad sex scene! We must have legislation! We
need to get to the bottom of this! The top screacher in Congress? Hillary
Rodham Clinton, New York (D). Going to try to sell me the line she's not a
liberal? If you want to see a liberal dictating larger government at tbe
expense of a person's personal life just look for the word "protect" and
you'll spot it. It's a bingo if "protect" is followed almost immediately by
"children".
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature