Re: Practical problems faced by new Debian user
On (02/08/05 16:59), nuno romano wrote:
> I have Debian 3.1Sarge(testing) from early
> May2005,since then I have
> downloaded binary packages from testing(latest May)
> and 3.1stable
> (early June) and with dpkg -install package_x.deb I
> usually get:
You're probably better off using aptitude which helps to handle a lot of
the dependency issues.
See: man aptitude
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
> package_x depends on libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21);however:
> Version of libc6 on system is 2.3.2.ds1-20
> ---> the programs were unpacked but not
> configured.(Can I FORCE the
> configuration in these cases -very close
> versions- ?)
> Well,a REAL libc6 incompatibility is not probable
> strict dpkg problem is what I see here.So,how can I
> surpass this?(I
> suppose that the package equivs -to fool dependencies-
> is not an option
> here).I simply don?t believe that we need to
> substitute major libraries
> each time we pick a new version of a program few weeks
> from sources to adapt to my environment is not
> optional,I don?t have the
> large majority of developer packages in my CD set).
> NOTE: I am aware that with apt-get POSSIBLY the cost
> of upgrading from
> libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 is only to
> change a few files,
> and a few minutes of Internet connection.Is that so?
> Or the ENTIRE new
> libc6 would be downloaded?
> I simply prefer to pick the packages manually with a
> EXAMPLE:In my CD set I don?t have MySQL-Admin and
> I got the sources and I have fallen in a HELL
> of dependencies
> trying to build the .deb binaries(need a lot
> of dev packages).
> So I got the .deb binaries and the only
> barrier I face to reach
> a proper installation is this libc6
> 2.3.2.ds1-21 dpkg warning.
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
...strategies for business