I am sorry, that you read it as me picking on newbies. That was not my
intention; I merely (attempted unarrogantly) tried to state the not-always
obvious.
I am also sorry to announce, that I am one of those, who will be ``jumping
down peoples' throats'' in the case of not keeping to the net-etiquette. It
really makes it less satisfying to be a part of the community. I suppose I
don't belong on -user with this standpoint; but as it seems like the only
place in Debian I may be of service, I stick around, keeping my annoyance to
myself (mostly, that is).
In defence of my post, though:
It is my experience, that the Windows-community uses cleartext files more
often than one assumes. (Opposite to arbitrary binary formats).
Often I have been able to extract the information I needed by treating the
files as cleartext.
I am also convinced, that no one would want to run a Windows-only IDE on a
GNU/Linux machine -- and I therefore assumed that Rajiv only wanted to do the
``extracting information''-part, and therefore could cope with `less`.
Project is a beast that I am afraid to learn. But I would be interested
to know if anyone has tried it in wine.
Not that I have the ability to command such development forces -- but wouldn't
creating a Microsoft-compatible program be a misallocation of Free Software
development ressources?
The trouble about .doc seems to prove that to me: The more we want a a
FS-alternative to a Microsoft program, the harder they will make it to
develop?
Regards, Anders Breindahl.