Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:23:18PM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Well, no matter whether the etch release next year or later is going to
> > be a big or a little upgrade, etch isn't stable yet, and so if
> > it's going to be 4.0 or 3.2 or 3.1415 or whatever, the numbers
> > (if any) for what we have now are going to have to be less than that.
> > So for the time being, 4.0 is probably inappropriate as a version
> > number.
>
> I don't see why 4 is inappropriate. 4 has been the successor to 3
> for a few thousand years. I don't think that will change in the next
> decade.
Nothing wrong with 4 as the number of the etch release. It's just
that until we *have* an etch release, the prereleases should have
numbers less than the actual relese.
-- hendrik
Reply to: