[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgrade woody-->sarge, KDE stops working



On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:11:23PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:58:15PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:21:01PM -0700, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > Got a problem with KDE after upgrading woody to sarge.
> > > I am running the i386 distribution. For historical
> > > reasons I will get around to sorting out one of these
> > > days, I run gdm then select a KDE session at login.
> > > 
> > > My X server has obviously survived the upgrade as gdm
> > > starts OK on boot and presents me with the usual login
> > > screen. Even my custom ModeLine settings for my
> > > display survived; my XF86Config-4 file is exactly the
> > > same as the backup copy I took before upgrading.
> > > 
> > > However on login, the X server appears to shut down
> > > (and gdm promptly re-starts it) -- so I log in and
> > > after some flashing of screens for a second or two I
> > > find myself back at the login screen again.
> > 
> > Very similar problems here:  after the upgrade, I use
> > xdm to log in.  My window manager is icewm.  But the
> > same problem.  It flashes screens for a maybe five or ten
> > seconds (I have a slow machine) and I'm back at the
> > login screen again.  So the problem may bot depend on
> > gdm and kde specifically, at least if I have the same
> > problem instead of just the same symptom.
> 
> The release notes for Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 ("sarge"), Intel 86
> -- upgrades chapter says to read
> /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/README.Debian-upgrade.gz
> before rebooting.  I haven't found the information there to be
> of much use,  except to tell me that the entire X susbystem
> bas been thouroghly churned and not to expect too much
> fron doing the upgrade.  Doing
>    apt-get install x-window-system
> doesn't seem to help.

I certainly *never* asked xdm to be held back, not icewm, yet
when I started an interactive aptitude session just now,
they were on the list of held-back packages, and their
installed version numbers were significantly behind the current
sarge ones.  Perhaps that's relevant???

Aptitude didn't complain about any potential broken dependencies,
so I went ahead and typed +.  I wonder why dist-upgrade didn't
update them.

There appears to be a large collection of other, similarly held back
packages.  I'll get to them next.

-- hendrik



Reply to: