Re: Top posting (a different point of view)
I agree with that point exactly.
PS: 2 points for anybody that can figure out which point, or even which
poster I'm agreeing with.
(I really did try to stay out of this...)
phil
Mark said:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Thursday June 9 2005 5:10 pm, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>>>
>>>>I completely agree. Whoever (the attribution is not clear to me)
>>>>wrote that crap about top posters vs bottom posters is an arrogant
>>>>idiot. Processing information in reverse order is much more
>>>>efficient
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you drive in reverse on the freeway, too? After all, doing it
>>> backwards is more efficient.
>
> Wait a minute, When you read a book. You start on page one and read
> right to the back of the book (Or bottom of the book) when you
> finish. Right?
>
> Same (should) go for emails, you start at the top with reading, and
> end up at the bottom where youre email answer begins.
>
> Is that not the best way of making it easier for other people to
> understand your email?
>
> Still, bottom posters may be fighting a lost battle. In all the
> companies i've worked for so far, there has not been a single
> company with a "bottom" post policy of any kind.
>
> These companies are usually the "exchange server" kind...
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> p.s.
> Sorry Paul, for replying to you alone...
Reply to: