On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:22:38 -0400 Rick Friedman <RickFriedman@verizon.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > I'll have to disagree on this. I think it is always better to > > specifically name the ditribution you want to track in sources.list. > > For example, woody, sarge, sid, etc. > > > > It is much more apparent, that way, what the intent is. > > > > -Roberto > > > > For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question. > Currently, I am running an "unstable" machine (I have unstable in > sources.list). I will probably keep that. I'm just curious: If someone > has "sid" in sources.list, does sid become the new testing? If so, > what will be the distro name of unstable? > > I hope that's clear. :) > > Rick > - -- > "If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators > would > be dead." - Johnny Carson > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFCo3stOlHq0MpoXLoRAg/aAJ9AANQ+OeMSy6Oe9hbKrTGAIQgkfgCdEW29 > AgZxNU7pRMh8MnevMbG37pc= > =PVNs > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org > Hey, Sid is and will allways be the unstable release so you dont need to worry. Its only testig and stable that change names. Hope this helps >From Grant.
Attachment:
pgp6pkChM6lSK.pgp
Description: PGP signature