Re: Once Sarge becomes stable...

[Rick Friedman <RickFriedman@verizon.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I'll have to disagree on this.  I think it is always better to
> specifically name the ditribution you want to track in sources.list.
> For example, woody, sarge, sid, etc.
> 
> It is much more apparent, that way, what the intent is.
> 
> -Roberto
> 

For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question.
Currently, I am running an "unstable" machine (I have unstable in
sources.list). I will probably keep that. I'm just curious: If someone
has "sid" in sources.list, does sid become the new testing? If so, what
will be the distro name of unstable?

I hope that's clear. :)

Rick
- --
 "If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would
be dead." - Johnny Carson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCo3stOlHq0MpoXLoRAg/aAJ9AANQ+OeMSy6Oe9hbKrTGAIQgkfgCdEW29
AgZxNU7pRMh8MnevMbG37pc=
=PVNs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----