[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?

On Wed, 04 May 2005 17:29:08 -0400, H S <greatexcalibur@yahoo.com> said: 

> Exactly! It is actually quite strange that an obvious option doesn't
> exist to prevent *real* cleaning so that make utility is taken
> advantage of. make-kpkg has been around for quite a while. Surely
> the original author(s) thought about this issue. I wonder if I am
> actually missing something here.

	Why does it have to be a make-kpkg option? It is simple enough
 to do otherwise. I understand the kitchen sink mentality, but I
 really do not want to read my email using make-kpkg (one emacs is

Beauty is one of the rare things which does not lead to doubt of
God. Jean Anouilh
Manoj Srivastava     <srivasta@acm.org>    <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: