Re: do I really need "make-kpkg clean"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from H. S.:
>>
>> do not take long. They are fine. It is only the compilaton of a new
>> kernel after "make-kpkg clean" that takes around 50 or 58 minutes (1.8
>> GHz PIV with 256 MB of RAM).
>
> You must have the slowest hard drive in existence. My 700 Mhz PIII
> does a kernel compile in 18 min.
>
You're trying to deviate this thread from the actual problem. What the OP
mentioned is a valid problem. How does one recompile a kernel without doing
a `make clean` or `make-kpkg clean` because if we do clean for every minor
change what's the benefit of makefiles.
rrs
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
research."
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCd7SR4Rhi6gTxMLwRAkmvAJ9XdQZuUhCHhmz8LWolA/jR2QObegCfS0eX
D2tv2hO2HbkHbHyb9HC9kPo=
=z4ll
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: