On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:11 -0700, mm wrote: > Is there any compelling reason to use `apt-get' over `aptitude', given > the latter's more robust feature set (installation tracking, for > example)? > > I've been using aptitude exclusively for about a year for installing > packages, yet still see a lot of new documentation with directives to > install/upgrade with apt-get. > > Thanks > To be honest i've never used anything other than apt-get, i guess if it aint broke..... Just always found it to be the faster solution for me -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Glyn Tebbutt | d3c3it-linux@ntlworld.com | |--------------' http://homepage.ntlworld.com/d3c3it | | gpg-key: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/d3c3it/d3c3it.gpg | | Lisa, if we conserve the environmentalist win | | -Homer Simpson | +---------------------------------------------------------+
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part