On 4/28/05, mm <mjukr.dotat@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there any compelling reason to use `apt-get' over `aptitude', given > the latter's more robust feature set (installation tracking, for > example)? On a very slow machine, it seems aptitude reads the package lists redundantly after an 'aptitude update'. Thus I update via apt-get. Not a terribly useful point, I know :)