[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system



On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 01:17:56AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2005 12:53 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 00:03 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > > I was using Ethereal, and reading the docs, when I realized the docs were
> > > for a newer version, so I added it with:
> > >
> > > apt-get install etherial=.10.??-? -t testing
> > >
> > >
> > > abiword: relocation error: /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0: undefined
> > > symbol: g_filename_display_name
> > >
Hi Hal,
here is info on my sid system:
-------------------------------------
kevin@debian:~/DOCUMENTS/IMAGES/FIG$ dpkg --get-selections|grep libgtk2.0
libgtk2.0-0                                     install
libgtk2.0-bin                                   install
libgtk2.0-common                                install
libgtk2.0-dev                                   install
kevin@debian:~/DOCUMENTS/IMAGES/FIG$ apt-file search
/usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0
libgtk2.0-0: usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
libgtk2.0-0: usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.400.13
libgtk2.0-dev: usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.a
libgtk2.0-dev: usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la
libgtk2.0-dev: usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so
kevin@debian:~/DOCUMENTS/IMAGES/FIG$
-------------------------------------
so, install libgtk2.0-0 at least.
Cheers,
Kev
-- 
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
        _,           _,      ,'`.
      `$$'         `$$'     `.  ,'
       $$           $$        `'
       $$           $$         _,           _
 ,d$$$g$$  ,d$$$b.  $$,d$$$b.`$$' g$$$$$b.`$$,d$$b.
,$P'  `$$ ,$P' `Y$. $$$'  `$$ $$  "'   `$$ $$$' `$$
$$'    $$ $$'   `$$ $$'    $$ $$  ,ggggg$$ $$'   $$
$$     $$ $$ggggg$$ $$     $$ $$ ,$P"   $$ $$    $$
$$    ,$$ $$.       $$    ,$P $$ $$'   ,$$ $$    $$
`$g. ,$$$ `$$._ _., $$ _,g$P' $$ `$b. ,$$$ $$    $$
 `Y$$P'$$. `Y$$$$P',$$$$P"'  ,$$. `Y$$P'$$.$$.  ,$$.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: