On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:22:23PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > Strangely, I couldn't get this form: > > /var/www 192.168.0.0/24(rwx) > > to work while this form: > > /var/www 192.168.0.100/255.255.255.0(rwx) > > does. YMMV. > Hi Nate, as I said, I wasn't sure whether you could replace the netmask with its short form /24 - but 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 should work, which would be the verbose, but standardized, notation. Jan -- Jan C. Nordholz <jckn At gmx net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature