Re: [OT] Call to arms...so to speak
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 11:57, Kirk Strauser wrote:
>On Monday 21 February 2005 18:36, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> I am just wondering where Win4Lin fits into the batch.
>
>It doesn't. I contacted Netraverse's sales department several times
> to ask for information, but they never bothered to reply until I
> wrote about my experiences on Slashdot.
>
Chuckle... Its amazing how often a comment on /. will be corrected by
somebody connected with the thing or company being panned.
But like you Kirk, I'd be a lot more concerned with the apparent lack
of interest in sales support as thats almost always a good indicator
of the level of the after the sale support you will get, in this case
zilch, bet on it.
>In my opinion, they're a company with a dead-end product that they
> no longer care about. Their opinion may differ, of course, but the
> way that (don't) treat potential customers says a lot to me.
>
>I'd be *much* more likely to play with the new Kqemu accelerator
> module that virtualizes x86 code rather than emulating it, for
> supposed 5x-10x increases in Qemu speed. It's basically in the
> VMWare ballpark now.
Interesting. Could I use it to run thor on a linux x86 box? Or is
this a reverse thing, that runs x86 code on moto stuff?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Reply to: