Re: CUPS doesn't see USB printer after being offline 2 weeks
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: CUPS doesn't see USB printer after being offline 2 weeks
- From: Dragan Cvetkovic <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:32:02 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <3Ava7firstname.lastname@example.org> (Henrique de Moraes Holschuh's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:30:07 +0100")
- References: <3Auebemail@example.com> <3Auebfirstname.lastname@example.org> <3Auebemail@example.com> <3Auebfirstname.lastname@example.org> <3Auebemail@example.com> <3Auebfirstname.lastname@example.org> <3Auebemail@example.com> <3Auebfirstname.lastname@example.org> <3Auebemail@example.com> <3Auebfirstname.lastname@example.org> <3Ava7email@example.com>
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, why do you consider this a 'braindamage'? You define
> Because such a complete lack of foreseeing as to name a system-wide command
> "enable" can not be anything but.
>> a printer using lpadmin, you 'enable' it and you make it 'accept'
>> requests. Of course, you can also 'disable' it and make it 'reject'
> It is certainly not a problem if "enable", "disable", etc are commands
> issued from within lpadmin. But having them as /usr/bin commands IS a very
> bad idea IMO.
It gets even worse. When you want to cancel a print job, you issue 'cancel'
To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer
!!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!!