[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: package shows no version number.



Hi Spencer,

It's better to send replies to the list, instead of replying to people
personally - unless it really is meant personal of course, in which
case just say so. A reply to the list means that others can learn as
well.

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:38:11AM -0500, spencer wrote:
> > Do you mean 
> > apt-get install wxpython
> > or
> > apt-get install wxpython2.5.3
> 
> I thought you didn't have to put the
> version number unless you wanted a
> specific version.So, I should see
> my current version.

Some packages have a version number in there name. Especially with
libraries or other packages where you sometimes want two versions to
exist together. See for example python. On my system:

$ dpkg -l python2.[012345]
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                  Version               Description
+++-=====================-=====================-==========================================================
ii  python2.1             2.1.3-27              An interactive high-level object-oriented language (versio
ii  python2.2             2.2.3dfsg-1           An interactive high-level object-oriented language (versio
ii  python2.3             2.3.4-19              An interactive high-level object-oriented language (versio
pn  python2.4             <none>                (no description available)

Note that e.g. package name python2.3 still has a version number: 2.3.4-19.

I'm not quite sure why I have three python versions, but everything
runs just fine. :)

-- 
Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ [Dutch/Nederlands] 
Public GnuPG key: keyserver.net ID 0x1735C5C2
"Let your advance worrying become advance thinking and planning."
 - Winston Churchill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: