Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2005 05:36 PM, Alvin Oga wrote:
> hi ya
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
>
>
>>take ext3. ext3 is reliable, and doesn't hickup when there is a badblock
>
>
> sure it does ... ext2 is underneath ext3... so its painful
I doubt that, ext2 is old, very reliable.
> and moreover, ext3 is subject to super long fsck when you hit the
> power switch on 20GB or 200GB or 2TB or 20TB systems
no? because it has journaling. I never had to this. this was ext2
> xfs, jfs, reiserfs recovers faster/better than ext3 from
> power off and resets
nope, xfs writes 0 in files, jfs I dunno, and reiserfs can simple break
totaly. Just read the ML and you will see ...
>>. XFS, ReiserFS, etc are high end journaling systems, they all are good,
>>but they are designed to run on raid,
>
>
> nonsense ... :-) ... journaling is good if:
<snip wrong info>
ext3 HAS journaling. I don't know where you get your information, but I
would do some research before posting.
>>where you don't see HW errors
>>because the raid below handles them.
>
> buy better disks if you have hw errors or better cables or
> from better retail outlets
I dunno, but at some point there where the IBM disk of death, plus the
fact that a HD (IDE) can ALWAYS die.
- --
[ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ]
[ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ]
[ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ]
[ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ]
[ http://www.tequila.co.jp http://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCCx82jBz/yQjBxz8RAghkAKDQP3GOr6DVPdvT5LC0uRH8649LIwCcDclO
WJoaNnr8EAFA/FcjiOBmYsI=
=wktE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: