[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 64 bit



On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:51 -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > 
> >>Quoting Rodney Richison <rodney@rcrcomputing.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Ok, my personal machine, the MB died.  Sooooo, should I do a 64bit board 
> >>>as a replacement or wait?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Do you want a machine that will do very heavy duty workload (large video
> >>editing and database apps)?  If so, then yes.
> > 
> > 
> > For DB, yes, but only video editing if you are running specialized
> > apps.  Why?  w32codecs doesn't natively run in 64 bit mode.
> > 
> 
> You shouldn't be encoding video with w32codecs anyway, you should be 
> using libavcodec[which is pretty much the default for mencoder as much 

I was thinking more of viewing afterwards.  The answer was a bit
jumbled/imprecise. :(

> as their is a default[you have to explicitly set the video codec to 
> something, I think]] or possibly libxvidcore, both of which are open 
> source[though I have no idea as to their 64-bit support].  The vast 
> majority of my video doesn't require w32codecs at all[ie any divx/xvid 
> is well supported natively].  Not sure what you mean by 'specialized apps'.

The expensive closed-source NLEs.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"Its easy to understand why the cat has eclipsed the dog as
modern America's favorite pet. People like pets to possess the
same qualities they do. Cats are irresponsible and recognize no
authority, yet are completely dependent on others for their
material needs. Cats cannot be made to do anything useful. Cats
are mean for the fun of it."
P. J. O'Rourke

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: