Re: appliances Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: appliances Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks
From: Roel Schroeven <rschroev_nospam_ml@fastmail.fm>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:40:54 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] csilj7$npu$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1050117214708.12322A-100000@Maggie.Linux-Consulting.com>
References: <[🔎] 1106026068.24993.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1050117214708.12322A-100000@Maggie.Linux-Consulting.com>

Alvin Oga wrote:

ahh but ... ext3 is still extremely bad for "appliances" with no
kb/screen/mouse


Why is it extremely bad?

there is no clear answer, but ext3 is not it since it depends on ext2A ..


Why is that such a bad thing?

I'd just like to know, since at first sight ext3 doesn't seem that bad achoice to me.


--
"Codito ergo sum"
Roel Schroeven

Reply to:

References:
- Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks
  - From: Blake Swadling <bswadling@newton.com.au>
- appliances Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks
  - From: Alvin Oga <aoga@ns.Linux-Consulting.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian packages similar to mathematica or mathlab ?
Next by Date: Re: where is the thunderbird 1.0 and xfce4.2
Previous by thread: appliances Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks
Next by thread: Re: unattended reboot for forced filesystem checks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread