[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on non-critical 
> > systems..." 
> > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more 
> > stability..."
> > 
> > I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be described as 
> > suited for desktops - they are development branches of debian, which are 
> > likely to break, which break and... so on. Most of you know :)
> Agreed.  Unstable is recommended only for people that "know what they are
> doing".  Certainly not for desktop usage, or anything like that.

Hmmmph.  Sid is great as a desktop.  I'm running Sid now.  Why would
you say that it's not a good desktop?

Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

After seeing all the viruses, trojan horses, worms and Reply
mails from stupidly-configured anti-virus software that's been
hurled upon the internet for the last 3 years, and the time/money
that is spent protecting against said viruses, trojan horses &
worms, I can only conclude that Microsoft is dangerous to the
internet and American commerce, and it's software should be

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: