Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?
first I'd like to thank Kevin for his nice diagram!
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 20:38, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a
> nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher, I'll add it :) )
but then I also got one concern, especially if this diagram gets used in more
or less official debian projects / occasions / whatever (this might be a good
place to add that I'm aware that Kevin started that diagram for hisself...) :
unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on non-critical
testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more
I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be described as
suited for desktops - they are development branches of debian, which are
likely to break, which break and... so on. Most of you know :)
I'm perfectly aware why some people advocate testing or sid for Desktops (the
good ol' "debian releases to seldom" argument...) - but as said I don't think
Debian should propagate this misconcepts.