Re: names good for marketing
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:08, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Tuesday, 04.01.2005 at 09:22 -0500, Brendan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 January 2005 04:26, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > > In a country of 300M people, [...]
> > >
> > > Sounds like you're referring to the US. Why restrict your comment
> > > to the US? Your remark would have more credibility if you weren't
> > > so US-centric.
> > I don't want to disrupt your obvious ploy for anti-US sentiment, but
> > maybe he doesn't speak for other countries for a reason? Maybe he
> > lives in the US? Just a guess.
> My comment wasn't anti-US. My comment was certainly anti-UScentricism,
> I was pointing out that that the original poster appeared to be speaking
> for the US, where the issue is larger than that.
So? He was speaking for what he knows. We should all be so smart.
I find many who are very eager to bull about things they have no personal
experience about, depleted uranium notwithstanding.