[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Windows vs Linux Functionality?



On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 20:12 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> English isn't read in random order, so please don't quote that way.
> http://ursine.dyndns.org/Top_Posting
> 
> On Saturday 25 December 2004 7:20 pm, Ed Sutherland wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I rarely "drive to the store" for software, but order online 
> > and the FedEx guy (or gal) brings it to my door. So far (and I admit 
> > I've just gotten my feet wet with Windows installations) the process  
> > installing programs (commercial, open source or somewhere in between)  
> > has been rather smooth and uneventful.
> 
> Well, that still takes six to eight weeks longer than it should have to 
> (not to mention the money part).
>  
> > I asked the question because my limited experience with Linux on the 
> > ppc side often (although not so much with debain) involved frustrating 
> > file dependancies or hang-ups where a package includes some -- but not 
> > all -- necessary files, requiring the user to chase down a library or 
> > other file. That may have improved.    
> 
> The problem you describe is known as RPM hell.  I think you can guess 
> why by now.  dpkg doesn't suffer that problem when you use apt: apt 
> figures it all out for you.

Because of QA, bug management (tremendously wonderful) and Policy,
STRICT Policy to boot for the Developers.
-- 
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net

The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster:  Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: