[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: visual c++ equivalent



At Wed, 08 Dec 2004 07:17:17 -0600,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> 
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
> > 
> >>is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
> >>searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
> >>it's not free.
> >>
> >>thanks,
> >>
> >>--me--
> >>
> > 
> > Hi MS,
> > well there are 3 things that make up vc++ from my perspective:
> > a)c++ language
> > b)gui toolkit
> > c)debugging/ide tool
> > point a is covered by the gcc collection (c,c++,fortran,...)
> > point b is covered by any toolkit (gdk,tk,qt,...)
> > point c can be covered by eclipse,gdb, and many others.
> > -Kev
> 
> Absolutely. Nothing beats plain gcc and Qt with gdb. I bought visual c++ 
> in 1994. Was it a mess. It brought on the move to Linux.
> 

And if you are interested even Microsoft themselves don't use visual. The whole
tool chain for windows is command line (I think it is proprietary though).

> H.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
>  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> 



Reply to: