Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:03:22 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wtwaj1dx.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041124213553.GB25205@deb2> (Mike M.'s message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:35:53 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 200411241155.iAOBtTk16110@Porthos.co.umist.ac.uk> <[🔎] 87brdnl53o.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] Nn4pd.22014$up1.4658@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <[🔎] 20041124213553.GB25205@deb2>

Mike writes:
> I could not support a distribution with gcc as non-free or removed.

Gcc-doc is a seperate packages.
-- 
John Hasler

Reply to:

References:
- Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
  - From: Adam Funk <a24061@yahoo.com>
- Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
  - From: Adam Funk <a24061@yahoo.com>
- Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
  - From: Mike M <no-linux-support@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
Next by Date: Re: can't mount -o remount,ro /usr
Previous by thread: Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
Next by thread: logout script
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread