Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 14:20, John Hasler wrote:
> Adam writes:
>> What is the problem with the GFDL?
>
> It does not comply with the DFSG and it has been decided that
> documentation
> is software (please don't start a flamewar about this. I don't agree
> with it either, but it is settled).
I don't want a flamewar either.
>> Are the Debian developers seriously proposing to get rid of all those
>> packages in the long run?
>
> They will be replaced with Free versions, moved to Non-Free, or
> removed.
>
> This will not affect Sarge.
What about the practical implications? How can you have a GNU/Linux
distribution without gcc, make and especially coreutils?
Reply to: