Re: autofs or am-utils?
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 10:42, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[🔎] 1100918433.23724.43.camel@haggis.homelan>,
> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> >If I just want my USB pen drive to be automounted & dismounted,
> >it sounds like autofs would be the one to use, then.
>
> Or supermount. That's a seperate kernel patch, though.
>
> http://supermount-ng.sourceforge.net/
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.9/2.6.9-ck2/patches/supermount-ng207.diff
supermount is only for 2.4 kernels. Does this mean that 2.6 kernels
already have this functionality?
Chris.
--
Chris Lale <chrislale@untrammelled.co.uk>
Reply to: