Re: mutt + squirrelmail
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Richard Lyons wrote:
> Do mutts and squirrels play together?
>
> Imap access has become sooo sloooow using kmail (seems even slower since
> my most recent upgrade on my desktop box - sid, BTW) and it is
> sometimes as bad using squirrelmail. So I ssh-d to the server and
> tried mutt. As far as I can tell, mutt cannot see subfolders that
> squirrelmail and kmail can.
I use both (almost exclusively mutt though) and don't seem to have
those problems, but I haven't really checked. But your problem may be
solved with the following snippet from the mutt doc:
6.3.85. imap_list_subscribed
Type: boolean
Default: no
This variable configures whether IMAP folder browsing will look for
only subscribed folders or all folders. This can be toggled in the
IMAP browser with the toggle-subscribed function.
HTH,
--
Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ [Dutch/Nederlands]
"Let your advance worrying become advance thinking and planning."
- Winston Churchill
Reply to: