[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mutt + squirrelmail



On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Richard Lyons wrote:
> Do mutts and squirrels play together?
> 
> Imap access has become sooo sloooow using kmail (seems even slower since 
> my most recent upgrade on my desktop box - sid, BTW) and it is 
> sometimes as bad using squirrelmail.  So I ssh-d to the server and 
> tried mutt.  As far as I can tell, mutt cannot see subfolders that 
> squirrelmail and kmail can.  

I use both (almost exclusively mutt though) and don't seem to have
those problems, but I haven't really checked. But your problem may be
solved with the following snippet from the mutt doc:

  6.3.85.  imap_list_subscribed

  Type: boolean
  Default: no

  This variable configures whether IMAP folder browsing will look for
  only subscribed folders or all folders.  This can be toggled in the
  IMAP browser with the toggle-subscribed function.

HTH,

-- 
Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ [Dutch/Nederlands]
"Let your advance worrying become advance thinking and planning."
 - Winston Churchill



Reply to: