Re: mutt + squirrelmail

[Richard Lyons <richard@the-place.net>]

On Thursday 18 November 2004 12:02, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Do mutts and squirrels play together?
> > 
> > Imap access has become sooo sloooow using kmail (seems even slower 
since 
> > my most recent upgrade on my desktop box - sid, BTW) and it is 
> > sometimes as bad using squirrelmail.  So I ssh-d to the server and 
> > tried mutt.  As far as I can tell, mutt cannot see subfolders that 
> > squirrelmail and kmail can.  
> 
> I use both (almost exclusively mutt though) and don't seem to have
> those problems, but I haven't really checked. But your problem may be
> solved with the following snippet from the mutt doc:
> 
>   6.3.85.  imap_list_subscribed
> 
>   Type: boolean
>   Default: no
> 
>   This variable configures whether IMAP folder browsing will look for
>   only subscribed folders or all folders.  This can be toggled in the
>   IMAP browser with the toggle-subscribed function.

Aah!  That looks likely.  I'll check when I get back later.  THanks.

-- 
richard