[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache



On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 17:17 +0530, Micheal Mukherji wrote:
> > No, because Linux doesn't see the CPU cache.  I'd bet my last
> > kopek that Paul is talking about:
> 
> Who said Linux sees CPU cache?
> He was asking the difference between the two.. or am I wrong?

Because Linux also has a "cache", as I pointed out in my previous
post.

Buffers:        138752 kB   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Cached:         326116 kB   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B

"Why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our
platform and association even though they be rabid pro-slavery
Democrats."
Susan B. Anthony, _History_of_Woman_Suffrage_
http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/essays/introduction.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: