Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Cc: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
From: Micheal Mukherji <michy.mighty@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:17:19 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 3b5373c904102204474445a93c@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Micheal Mukherji <michy.mighty@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1098444223.18808.38.camel@haggis.homelan>
References: <[🔎] 87hdonyzix.fsf@ursine.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 3b5373c90410220356327e8324@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1098444223.18808.38.camel@haggis.homelan>

> No, because Linux doesn't see the CPU cache.  I'd bet my last
> kopek that Paul is talking about:

Who said Linux sees CPU cache?
He was asking the difference between the two.. or am I wrong?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

References:
- Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Micheal Mukherji <michy.mighty@gmail.com>
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Bugs in g++ on Sarge?
Next by Date: Re: Netatalk2
Previous by thread: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Next by thread: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread