Re: Is there a stable mail client for linux?
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Douglas G. Phillips wrote:
> > It might not complain, but it'll take its sweet ass time loading a large
> > mailbox.
> It's a lot faster than some others, especially Evolution with huge mbox
> files, IMHO. If you have issues with the speed, try switching to
> maildir format -- much faster with large mailboxes.
I already use Maildir. In general, mutt is probably the slowest mail
client I've seen, those gnus beats it in slowness in some situations.
Blast you and your estrogenical treachery!