Hi Koos Vriezen, *, Koos Vriezen wrote: > This is probably a stupid question, but I did a search on this list with > 'apt-get source dpkg -i upgrade' and there was no answer, so here it is. > > I've upgraded gcc from 3.3 to 3.4 and, since I always build KDE from > CVS, I needed to recompile some c++ dependent packages like fam. > So, I got fam with 'apt-get source libfam0c102 libfam-dev', builded the > packages and installed it with 'dpkg -i libfam0c102_2.7.0-5_i386.deb > libfam-dev_2.7.0-5_i386.deb'. I did the same for expat (turned out not > c++, but anyways, so I build it but didn't install it). > Now if I do 'apt-get -s upgrade', I get > > # apt-get -s upgrade > Pakketlijsten worden ingelezen... Klaar > Boom van vereisten wordt opgebouwd... Klaar > De volgende pakketten zullen opgewaardeerd worden: > libfam-dev libfam0c102 > 2 pakketten opgewaardeerd, 0 nieuwe paketten geïnstalleerd, 0 verwijderen en 0 niet opgewaardeerd. > Inst libfam0c102 [2.7.0-5] (2.7.0-5 Debian:testing) > Inst libfam-dev [2.7.0-5] (2.7.0-5 Debian:testing) > Conf libfam0c102 (2.7.0-5 Debian:testing) > Conf libfam-dev (2.7.0-5 Debian:testing) > > so it wants to replace it again what I just build. How can I prevent this? > What's puzzling me most is that this seems so a common thing to do, jet > I can't find this issue in the apt-howto document. > I tried the local repository method, adding 'deb file:/usr/src/debian debs' > in sources.list, doing a 'apt-get update'. But now I get: > > # apt-get -s upgrade > Pakketlijsten worden ingelezen... Klaar > Boom van vereisten wordt opgebouwd... Klaar > De volgende pakketten zullen opgewaardeerd worden: > libexpat1 libexpat1-dev > 2 pakketten opgewaardeerd, 0 nieuwe paketten geïnstalleerd, 0 > verwijderen en 0 niet opgewaardeerd. > Inst libexpat1 [1.95.6-8] (1.95.6-8 Debian:testing) > Inst libexpat1-dev [1.95.6-8] (1.95.6-8 Debian:testing) > Conf libexpat1 (1.95.6-8 Debian:testing) > Conf libexpat1-dev (1.95.6-8 Debian:testing) > > W/o the -s, it downloads the expat pkgs instead of using the local ones. So > this didn't fix it. > A local archive is a good idea. Check out what is going on with apt-cache policy <pkg>. There you can see the preferences used by apt. Maybee you can tune /etc/apt/preferences and pin your packages in the local archive with a pin priority over 1000. Therefor you need a Release file in your local archive. See man apt_preferences Kind regards Martin Theiß -- Martin Theiß <mtheiss@neo.wh-stutgart.de> GPG-Fingerprint: EC80 53A2 F0A2 6E6C 74D2 CB6E 002A F6D3 E78B 7F45 The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I installed Linux - TKK 5
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature