Re: Visual C++?????
That would definitely fit in with Microsoft?s business model of 'lets break everything so it only works with our broken implementation'
Thank the gods for Open Source and free standards.
On 29 Jun 2004 at 18:58, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:19:42PM +0200, Joris Huizer wrote:
> >
> > The worst thing I know of Visual C++ is,
> >
> > for (int i = 0; .... )
> > ...
> > ...
> > ...
> > for (int i = 0; .... )
> >
> > won't work as the thing parses as if it's still 1990 (something like
> > that) - this syntax wasn't legal once
>
> I have it on moderately good (but anonymous) authority that a few
> years ago it was deliberate Microsoft policy for their C++ implementations
> to be *in*compatible with others. I don't know whether that policy is
> still in force now.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: