[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RAID performance



In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1040413113843.21257B-100000@Maggie.Linux-Consulting.com>,
Alvin Oga  <aoga@ns.Linux-Consulting.com> wrote:
>> As for filesystems, I personally prefer ReiserFS, but that's just
>> personal preference. If you're comfortable with ext3, then by all
>> means use ext3.
>
>ditto, reiserfs is a better choice than ext3
>
>	see the reiserfs vs ext3 benchmarks at namesys.com

With many small files reiserfs might be faster. But in all the
bonnie-like pure disk I/O tests I ran on fast disk arrays,
ext3 is much much faster than reiserfs.

And if you're using mainly large files, XFS is faster still.
Run your own benchmarks, don't trust others ...

Mike.



Reply to: