[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: branding debian releases



Gregory Seidman wrote:

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:19:39PM +0200, Pim Bliek | PingWings.nl wrote:
} My suggestions for new names:
} } Stable --> CURRENT_STABLE
} Testing --> ALMOST_STABLE
} Unstable --> NEW_NOT_PROVEN
[...]

Hm. Too long for my taste. People aren't going to bother typing
something that long in IRC. I'd say we want pithy but clear. How about:

stable ---> lowrisk
testing --> current
unstable -> earlyaccess

Greg's is more pithy, but Pim's is more clear.

stable ---> current
testing --> next_version
unstable -> in_development

 or

stable ---> current
testing --> beta
unstable -> alpha

 or

stable ---> no_pain
testing --> pinprick
unstable -> broken_finger_or_three

 or

stable ---> lowrisk
testing --> somerisk
unstable -> morerisk

 or

stable ---> lowrisk
testing --> somerisk
unstable -> morerisk_but_better_than_any_other_distro_so_use_this_for_desktop_workstations


None of which I particularly like, but I had fun doing it . . . .

--
Kent




Reply to: