Re: Spamassasin on Woody - standard install using spamc fails??
On 13 Apr 2004, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2004-04-12 15:25:39 -0700, Peter Sebastian Masny wrote:
> > Hrmph. Old spamassassin incompatible with new perl in stable.
> >
> > Using the proposed-update spamassassin (woody4) did not fix the problem
> > Probably have to use testing version, which means testing for a bunch
> > of libraries... sigh.
>
> Anyway the woody version of spamassassin marks too many legitimate
> messages as spam.
>
So why not use spamprobe instead? I get no false positives at all and
only about 2 false negatives most days.
Anthony
--
ac@acampbell.org.uk || http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic
Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles
Reply to: