Re: When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)
From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:46:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0404122243080.1909@diku.intranet.braincell.com>
Reply-to: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040412204759.781eebd1.cmetzler@speakeasy.net>
References: <[🔎] 200404121639.22826.kruml@xtria.com> <[🔎] 20040412220433.GA21881@dman13.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20040412204759.781eebd1.cmetzler@speakeasy.net>

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Chris Metzler wrote:

> One thing that I've never understood, and haven't figured out by
> reading the Debian Reference or by osmosis from posts here (probably
> the Debian Developer documents is where I *should* look) is how the
> "goals" for a release are determined and communicated to anyone
> interested.
>

If you find out can you let me know?

I propose the Debian distributions be renamed to

oozing
settling
congealed

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)
  - From: Will Trillich <will@serensoft.com>

References:
- Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.
  - From: Kevin Ruml <kruml@xtria.com>
- Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.
  - From: "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <dman@dman13.dyndns.org>
- When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)
  - From: Chris Metzler <cmetzler@speakeasy.net>

Prev by Date: aptitude hosed X
Next by Date: Re: Debian has turned unusable.
Previous by thread: When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)
Next by thread: Re: When a release is "ready." (was Re: Re: Debian has turned unusable.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread