Re: something wrong with BIG jigdo templates?
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:53:01AM -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> >On Mit, 2004-04-07 at 00:30, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> >
> >The URL in the first post was wrong, and perhaps a few more words are in
> >order.
> >After reading a little about debian for hppa, it was obvious that I'd
> >better try sarge. I went to the debian "Downloading Debian CD images
> >with jigdo" page, and followed the link for the "official" testing
> >distribution, dated 14-Feb-2004.
> >
> >but jigdo complained about 510 missing files, so I checked the
> >"unofficial" images, also linked from the above named Debian page.
> >I ended up here
> >(ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/jigdo/), and
> >this is where I found incredibly large template files, not only for
> >hppa.
> >
> >cu,
> >Schnobs
> >
> >
>
> Seem OK to me:
>
> sarge-arm-1.template 1979 KB 04/04/04 03:46:00
>
Yes but OTOH:
sarge-arm-8.template 640676 KB 04/04/04 10:59:00
sarge-arm-9.template 647528 KB 04/04/04 11:07:00
sarge-hppa-1.template 550677 KB 04/06/04 00:06:00
and for comparison from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/hppa/jigdotemplates/
sarge-hppa-1.template 14-Feb-2004 18:29 17.7M
Looks pretty strange to me.
> That's normal size and I just clicked on the site where you said you
> ended up.
>
> Hugo
>
--
Chris Harris <charris@rtcmarketing.com>
-------------------------------------------
GNU/Linux --- The best things in life are free.
Reply to: