Re: something wrong with BIG jigdo templates?
On Mit, 2004-04-07 at 20:00, CW Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:53:01AM -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> > Seem OK to me:
> >
> > sarge-arm-1.template 1979 KB 04/04/04 03:46:00
> >
> Yes but OTOH:
> sarge-arm-8.template 640676 KB 04/04/04 10:59:00
> sarge-arm-9.template 647528 KB 04/04/04 11:07:00
> sarge-hppa-1.template 550677 KB 04/06/04 00:06:00
>
> and for comparison from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/hppa/jigdotemplates/
>
> sarge-hppa-1.template 14-Feb-2004 18:29 17.7M
I tried the jigdo/template files from gluck.debian.org, but here I end
up with an incomplete jigdo image... and nothing to rsync against.
Reply to: