[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is Grub going to be official Sarge boot loader?



On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:30:15 +0100, Roberto Sanchez wrote:

> Raiz-mpx wrote:
>> After reading Debian Weekly News for March 16th, it mentions that; 
>> 	"This release features the new partitioner that supports automatic
>> 	partitioning and LVM and uses [43]grub as boot-loader on i386."
>> 
>> So does this means that my favorite boot loader will be the official 
>> Debian boot loader instead of Lilo?
>> 
>> I know its not really that big of deal, as anyone can apt-get Lilo, 
>> but might save users a little bit of headache due to the boot loader 
>> issues.
>> 
>> Rthoreau
>> 
>> 
> 
> What I want to know is when dpkg/apt will support grub.  I
> roll my own kernels, and (naturally) use dpkg to install them.
> I like how dpkg automatically updates the symlinks and runs lilo.
> One of the reasons I have resisted installing grub is the lack
> of automated support.  Does anyone know for sure?
> 
> -Roberto

[bloom@kabloom ~]% cat /etc/kernel-img.conf 
# Do not create symbolic links in /
postinst_hook = /sbin/update-grub
postrm_hook = /sbin/update-grub
do_bootloader = no
do_symlinks = no
do_initrd = Yes

There. Now dpkg/apt supports grub (and not Lilo).

-- 
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
My key was last signed 10/14/2003. If you use GPG *please* see me about 
signing the key. ***** My computer can't give you viruses by email. ***



Reply to: