On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:36AM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:19:11PM -0500, S.D.A. wrote: > > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail). > > > > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that reads > > the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be running > > 'sa-learn' as mail user? > > Depends on your implementation. If you're set up the way I am[1], > then you run spamassassin's utilities as yourself. Well like I said, my implemenation WAS running it from Exim. Now I believe Exim runs as mail-user. So the question was, should sa-learn be run as that user, when using _my_ implementation. Anyway, it's all moot, as I'm now using Spamprobe. After training it, I'm finding it better for _my use_ than SpamAssassin. BTW, Spamprobe is proven. It's been around for some time, and an added plus, is it's fast, it's written in C++. On older, slower servers, SA, is just too resource intensive, being that it's basically perl scripts. IMO. -- Steve +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wednesday Mar 10 2004 12:46:01 PM EST +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra
Attachment:
pgpU5DQorI1aD.pgp
Description: PGP signature