On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:02:53AM +0000 or thereabouts, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote:
> > Howdy folks:
> >
> > Something that has puzzled me for a bit, and I'd appreciate
> > advice/insight.
> >
> > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail).
> >
> > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that reads
> > the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be running
> > 'sa-learn' as mail user?
> >
> > I'm wondering as I've been training SA for some time, and I'm not sure
> > it's taking advantage of what's in my ~/Home .spamassassin directory,
> > bayes_tok et al.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Perhaps this is drawing a red herring across the trail, but I can't help
> wondering why more people don't use spamprobe in preference to
> spamassassin. IME spamprobe is easier to set up and extremely effective.
> I see only about 2 or 3 false negatives a day at most and no false
> positives at all.
You know, I like spamprobe -- I was using it a year ago, and was quite
fond of it. Does it do a razor lookup now? That's about the only
thing I like about SA -- I'd be happy to ditch SA (it's a resource hog).
Any advice would be appreciated.
--
Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tuesday Mar 09 2004 08:46:01 AM EST
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The computer should be doing the hard work. That's what it's paid to do,
after all.
-- Larry Wall in <199709012312.QAA08121@wall.org>
Attachment:
pgpvhaykIZDFe.pgp
Description: PGP signature