Re: GCC
Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net> writes:
> C++ seems to be steaming away in this direction. I've got my doubts
> that the .h is going away in C however.
As far as I know, nobody has proposed that the C header files change
in this way.
> It seems that this is going to cause more portability problems than
> it solves. Code written for advanced compilers will be incompatible
> with older compilers.
This has been a problem of C++ for at least a decade. But at least
it looks like it's finally getting better now that the standard is
standardized and compilers catch up.
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - I am the rocks.
PUNNY BOOK = Small Vegetables: Russell Sprout.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC
- From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>
- References:
- GCC
- From: Debian User <bfarnell@knology.net>
- Re: GCC
- From: Werner Mahr <werner@vollstreckernet.de>
- Re: GCC
- From: Johann Koenig <explosive@hvc.rr.com>
- Re: GCC
- From: Roberto Sanchez <rcsanchez97@yahoo.es>
- Re: GCC
- From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>
- Re: GCC
- From: Ed Cogburn <edcogburn@hotpop.com>
- Re: GCC
- From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>
- Re: GCC
- From: Dave Thorn <davet@fysh.org>
- Re: GCC
- From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>