Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 07:46:56PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Oh, fun fact. I worked in a national ISP where both the director of my
> department and manager of my group had the same administrative assistant.
> You'd think that in a national ISP, one that was heavily unix based at
> that, also one that was driven on email you'd see such technical wonders at
> work. 3 years, never once saw it. That's how useful it is in the real
> world. She was CC'd, she was told face-to-face to email us. Never...
> once... was repiy-to used.
You may be unique in this. Many other people have posted many
examples of reply-to being used legitimately.
> Now you expect me to believe that the mutlitude of PHBs in non-IT
> related fields are going to appreciate the wonderous workings of
> reply-to.
Believe what you will, you're entrenched beyond reason right now to
the point where you won't even believe other people's first-hand
experience in far more luser-heavy environments (trust me, tech
support houses have normally clueful people that get knocked down a
few notches by the end of the day from the telebogodynamic rift that
causes morons to call in. 8:o)
> See that bridge over yonder? Ya want it? It's for sale.
The Marquam Bridge? That one on I-5 that has several hundred tons
greater than it's designed capacity on it 14 hours a day, and has two
more lanes in each direction than it was designed for? Hell no, I
won't even drive on it. That POS is due to drop into the Willamette
any time now... Taking I-405 to US-30 is faster because everybody
slows down whiteknuckling the steering wheel going across the Marquam
anyway...
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAJGUFUzgNqloQMwcRArjKAKDEQPebDYNwGJz00Sv1PAaRrPYaqACgjeNC
eC013L2PC40QJeY5q4Z9RME=
=eRXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: