ALSA, kernel 2.4.24-1-686 and intel AC'97 sound card
Have successfully got ALSA running on my -k7 with an ensoniq 1371 by
following the instructions here
http://www.linuxorbit.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=541&page=1
And by following the info under the "Stock Debian kernel without
precompiled modules" section. Only difference was that it was also
necessary to install alsa-base and alsa-utils - just prior to
installing the build alsa-module deb.
So - I've just tried the same on this -1-686 with
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
Searching alsa-project seems to imply that you need the intel8x0
driver - at least
http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa/driver-source/pci/intel8x0m.c shows
the 82180CA card although the soundcard search on the alsa pages does
not.
Built the module, installed it and rebooted.
lsmod gives for sound modules:
snd-seq-oss 29632 0 (unused)
snd-seq-midi-event 3264 0 [snd-seq-oss]
snd-seq 36624 2 [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event]
snd-pcm-oss 39172 0 (unused)
snd-mixer-oss 13392 0 [snd-pcm-oss]
snd-intel8x0 19400 2
snd-ac97-codec 48556 0 [snd-intel8x0]
snd-pcm 61476 2 [snd-pcm-oss snd-intel8x0]
snd-timer 14500 0 [snd-seq snd-pcm]
snd-page-alloc 6324 0 [snd-intel8x0 snd-pcm]
gameport 1676 0 [snd-intel8x0]
snd-mpu401-uart 3328 0 [snd-intel8x0]
snd-rawmidi 13472 0 [snd-mpu401-uart]
snd-seq-device 4192 0 [snd-seq-oss snd-seq snd-rawmidi]
snd 33252 0 [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-intel8x0 snd-ac97-codec snd-pcm snd-timer snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi snd-seq-device]
audio 43352 0 (unused)
soundcore 3940 5 [snd audio]
And at boot time I get the messages:
intel8x0: clocking to 48000
ALSA mixer_oss.c:1224: unable to register OSS mixer device 0:0
ALSA pcm_oss.c:2376: unable to register OSS PCM device 0:0
Google for ALSA "unable to register OSS PCM" gives hits for the 2.6
kernel but not the 2.4.
Anyone got ALSA running for this sound card?
--
Chris Searle
debian@chrissearle.org
Reply to: