Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
From: Jan Minar <Jan.Minar@seznam.cz>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:40:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040105094023.GD24469@kontryhel>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040105092123.GA24469@kontryhel>
References: <[🔎] 3FF4DAA0.6070405@sympatico.ca> <[🔎] 200401041759.34781.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> <[🔎] bt9lqm$qal$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 200401050451.06959.satimis@icare.com.hk> <[🔎] 20040105092123.GA24469@kontryhel>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:21:23AM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> Please make sure to understand the advises before reporting further
> problems the next time :-(

Maybe I've gone too far; withdrawing this and apologizing.

Peace.
Jan.

-- 
Jan Minar                   "Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed." x 7

Attachment: pgpreJLje8bXm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`
  - From: root <w_ashley@sympatico.ca>
- Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`
  - From: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>
- Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device`
  - From: Andreas Janssen <andreas.janssen@bigfoot.com>
- Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
  - From: Stephen Liu <satimis@icare.com.hk>
- Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
  - From: Jan Minar <Jan.Minar@seznam.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
Next by Date: Re: pam_limits setrlimit log message
Previous by thread: Re: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
Next by thread: Re: Fw: 2.6.0, ppp, devfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread